The Use of Science Laboratories with Cookbook and Inquiry-Based Methods to Enhance Students' 21st-Century Thinking Skills
Abstract
The present study aims to: 1) interpret the role of laboratories in science learning and 21st-century academic skills; 2) evaluate the effectiveness of laboratories use with cookbook and inquiry-based science learning in improving students' 21st-century thinking skills. The study was conducted using a narrative literature review method, which involves independently collecting, reviewing, and synthesizing various previous studies in the library and journal house of UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung and other reputable sources. The data sources are references (e.g. books and journal articles) from reputable publishers. The results indicate that: 1) the laboratory use with the cookbook method provides structured and easy-to-follow experimental procedures, while with the inquiry method, it encourages students' independent exploration and problem solving; 2) the combination of these two methods can strengthen conceptual understanding and basic laboratory techniques, as well as develop students' critical thinking skills, creativity, collaboration, and digital literacy. The implications of the present study are the need to integrate the cookbook and inquiry methods in the science curriculum to prepare students to face the challenges of the 21st century.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Afsas, S. K., Sutikno, & Fianti. (2023). Penerapan Pembelajaran Berbasis Praktikum untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa. Journal on Education, 6(1), 8913–8926. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v6i1.4375
Bertsch, C., Kapelari, S., & Unterbruner, U. (2014). From cookbook experiments to inquiry based primary science: influence of inquiry based lessons on interest and conceptual understanding. Inquiry in Primary Science Education, 1(March), 20–31. www.plantscafe.net.
Boholano, H. B. (2017). Smart social networking: 21st Century teaching and learning skills. Research in Pedagogy, 7(2), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.17810/2015.45
Cossa, E. F. R., & Uamusse, A. A. (2015). Effects of an In-service Program on Biology and Chemistry Teachers’ Perception of the Role of Laboratory Work. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 167, 152–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.656
Dhamayanti, P. V. (2022). Systematic literature review: Pengaruh Strategi Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik. Indonesian Journal of Educational Development, 3(2), 209–219. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7026884
Harefa, E. (2023). Analisis Komparatif Penggunaan Massive Open Online Course Dan Pembelajaran Offline Terhadap Perilaku Belajar Dan Hasil Prestasi Akademik Mahasiswa Pgsd. Jurnal Elementary, 6(1), 5–10. https://doi.org/10.31764/elementary.v6i1.11903
Jong, T. de, Lazonder, A. W., Chinn, C. A., Fischer, F., Gobert, J., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Koedinger, K. R., Krajcik, J. S., Kyza, E. A., Linn, M. C., Pedaste, M., Scheiter, K., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2023). Let’s talk evidence – The case for combining inquiry-based and direct instruction. Educational Research Review, 39(May), 100536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100536
Khalaf, B. K., & Zin, Z. B. M. (2018). Traditional and inquiry-based learning pedagogy: A systematic critical review. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 545–564. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11434a
Linn, M. C., Davis, E. A., & Bell, P. (2013). Internet environments for science education. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.
Nababan, K. (2023). Peran Kreativitas Guru dan Ketersediaan Laboratorium dalam Pelaksanaan Praktikum Kimia untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa di SMA. JOURNAL SYNTAX IDEA, 5(10), 1689–1695. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46799/syntax-idea.v5i10.2659
National Research Council. (2006). America’s Lab Report: Investigations in High School Science. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17226/11311
Pellegrino, J. W. (2014). Assessment as a positive influence on 21st century teaching and learning: A systems approach to progress. Psicologia Educativa, 20(2), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pse.2014.11.002
Puspa, C. I. S., Rahayu, D. N. O., & Parhan, M. (2023). Transformasi Pendidikan Abad 21 dalam Merealisasikan Sumber Daya Manusia Unggul Menuju Indonesia Emas 2045. Jurnal Basicedu, 7(5), 3309–3321. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v7i5.5030
Rahayu, S. (2017). Mengoptimalkan aspek literasi pembelajaran kimia abad 21. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Kimia UNY: Sinergi Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran Untuk Mendukung Pengembangan Literasi Kimia Pada Era Global, 1(Oktober), 1–16.
Saefi, M., Adi, W. C., Rahmasiwi, A., Maghfiroh, H., Setiawan, M. E., Adlini, M. N., & Rizalia, S. (2023). Teaching microbial analysis techniques for the characterisation of baker’s yeast through the inquiry-based laboratory. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 9(3), 282–292. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v9i3.29201
Samad, M. R. A., Iksan, Z. H., & Khalid, F. (2019). Acceptance and Readiness to Use M-Learning among Primary School Science Teachers. Creative Education, 10(12), 3003–3011. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2019.1012224
Scager, K., Boonstra, J., Peeters, T., Vulperhorst, J., & Wiegant, F. (2016). Collaborative learning in higher education: Evoking positive interdependence. CBE Life Sciences Education, 15(4), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-07-0219
Shambare, B., & Simuja, C. (2024). Exploring the Integration of Virtual Laboratories in Science Education : Insights From Rural Teachers in South Africa. International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments, 14(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJVPLE.348957
Simbolon, D. H., & Sahyar. (2015). Effects of Guided Inquiry Learning Model Based Real Experiments and Virtual Laboratory Towards The Results of Students’ Physics Learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 21(3), 299–315. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v21i3.192
Singer, S., & Smith, K. A. (2013). Discipline-Based Education Research: Understanding and Improving Learning in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 102(4), 468–471. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20030
Trujillo, G., & Tanner, K. D. (2014). Considering the role of affect in learning: Monitoring students’ self-efficacy, sense of belonging, and science identity. CBE Life Sciences Education, 13(1), 6–15. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-12-0241
Wahyudin, Y., & Rahayu, D. N. (2020). Analisis Metode Pengembangan Sistem Informasi Berbasis Website: A Literatur Review. Jurnal Interkom: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmiah Bidang Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi, 15(3), 26–40. https://doi.org/10.35969/interkom.v15i3.74
Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2011). Ambitious Pedagogy by Novice Teachers: Who Benefits from Tool-Supported Collaborative Inquiry into Practice and Why? Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 113(7). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811111300702
Zou, T. X. P., Ko, E. I., & Mickleborough, N. (2012). Promoting Multi-Layered Peer Learning in a Course on Engineering Grand Challenges. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 56(Ictlhe), 74–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.634
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31332/kd.v5i1.8992
Copyright (c) 2024 Meissy Nuraini Putri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Kulidawa indexed by:
2.png){kind=logo}
Jurnal Kulidawa under by Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.