Paradigma dan Revolusi Ilmiah Thomas S. Kuhn (Aspek Sosiologis, Antropologis, dan Historis dari Ilmu Pengetahuan)
Abstract
The development of positivism now has entered the realm of science. This makes it a distinction between what is called scientific and unscientific in science and makes space in the scientific world narrow with authoritative benchmarks. Therefore in this study using a phenomenological approach in the perspective of the philosophy of science in order to get the core problems and deep solutions related to discussion with science. The method used in this paper is a descriptive method wherein to find the definitions contained in the problem to combine into a narrative in order to explain the core problems. And from the existing research it can be concluded that one of the figures who criticized the notion of positivism was Thomas Kuhn. Kuhn invites researchers to turn to a paradigmative perspective where this perspective broadens the scope of science to every aspect of life, including in the social field.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)References
A. Asrudin, 2014, “Thomas Kuhn dan Teori Hubungan Internasional: Realisme sebagai Paradigma”, dalam Jurnal IJIS, Jilid 1, No. 2.
A.F Chalmer, Apa Itu Yang Dinamakan Dengan Ilmu, diterjemahkan dari karya what’s this called Science, (Jakarta: Hasta Mitra).
Blackburn, Simon, Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, (Oxford University Press, 2008).
Bridgwater, William, et.al, The Columbia Encyclopedia, Edisi: Third, (Washington D.C.: National Science Teachers Association, 1963).
C. Verhaak dan R. Haryono Imam, Filsafat Ilmu Pengetahuan, Telaah Atas Cara Kerja Ilmu-Ilmu, (Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka).
Fuad dkk, 2015, “Kebenaran Ilmiah dalam Pemikiran Thomas S. Khun dan Karl R. Popper: Suatu Kajian Hermeneutika dan Kontribusinya dalam Kemajuan Ilmu”, dalam Jurnal Filsafat, Vol. 25, No. 2.
Hasbullah, Mueflich (Ed.), Islamisasi Ilmu Pengetahuan, (Jakarta: Pustaka Cidesindo, 2000).
Heriyanto, Hussain, Paradigma holistik Dialog Filsafat, Sains, dan Kehidupan Menurut Shadra dan Whitehead, (Jakarta Selatan: Teraju, 2003)
Jena, Yeremias, “Thomas Kuhn Tentang Perkembangan Sains dan Kritik Larry Laudan”, Melintas Vol. 20, No. 2, 2012.
Kuhn, Thomas S., The Structure of Scientific Revolution: Peran Paradigma dalam Revolusi Sains, terj. Tjun Surjaman, (Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya, 2012).
Longman, Longman Dictionary of American English, cet. 3, (China: Morton World Processing Ltd., 2002).
Lubis, Akhyar Yusuf, 2015, Filsafat Ilmu: Klasik Hingga Kontemporer (Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada).
Muslih, Muhammad, 2016, Filsafat Ilmu: Kajian atas Asumsi Dasar Paradigma dan Kerangka Teori Ilmu Pengetahuan, (Yogyakarta: LESFI).
Muslih, Muhammad “Pengaruh Budaya dan Agama Terhadap Sains Sebuah Survey Kritis”, dalam Jurnal Tsaqafah Vol. 6, No. 2, Oktober 2010.
Ritzer, George, Sosiologi Pengetahuan Berparadigma Ganda, terj. Alimandan, cet. 5, (Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2004).
Sofyan, Ayi, Kapita Selekta Filsafat, (Bandung: Pustaka Setia).
Sardar, Zianuddin, Thomas Kuhn dan Perang Ilmu, (Yogyakarta: Penerbit Jendela).
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31332/zjpi.v5i1.1318
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 Nur Akhda Sabila
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
