Types of Commentary Feedback

Kurnia Mukhlis, Suhartini Syukri


This study aims to investigate types of lecturer commentary feedback on EFL students’ L2 writing through online class (Schoology) in writing class semester 4 of English Education major at IAIN Kendari. This study is conducted to classify types of commentary feedback which can help students to revise their own writing. Besides, this study is expected to ease another researcher or teacher to express their comments hsing these types of commentary feedback as a reference. This study utilized students’ draft as the instrument. To obtain the data, the researcher used qualitative research design. In analyzing the data, the researcher gathered students' draft which contained lecturer commentaries feedback that has been classified by coding the data to get the result. The result of this study reveals that there are five types commentary feedback that the lecturer applied to the students.

Full Text:



Alamis, M. M. P. (2010). Evaluating students’ reactions and responses to teachers’ written feedbacks. Philippine ESL Journal,5, 40-54.

Al-Sawahla, A. M. (2016). EFL Jordanian students’ reaction to written comments on their written work: a case study. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 7(1), 63-77.

Bitchener, J., & Ferris, D. (2012).Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing. New York: Routledge – Taylor & Francis Group.

Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2008). The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students. Language Teaching Research, 12, 409-431.

Ellis, R., Sheen, Y., Murakami, M., & Takashima, H. (2008). The effect of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback on Japanese university students use of English articles in narratives. System, 36, 353-371.

Ferris, D. R. (1997). The influence of teacher commentary on student revision. Tesol Quarterly, 31(2), 315-339.

Ferris, D. R. & Hedgcock, J. (2005). Teaching ESL composition: purpose, process, and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Frear, D. (2009). The effect of focused and unfocused direct written corrective feedback on a new piece of writing. College English: Issues and Trends, 3, 57-72.

Hyatt, David F. (2005). ‘Yes, a very good point!’: a critical genre analysis of a corpus of feedback commentaries on master of education assignments. Teaching in Higher Education, 10(3), 339-353.

Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Leki, I. (2006). ‘You cannot ignore’: graduate L2 students’ experience of and responses to written feedback practices within their disciplines. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (eds.), 266-285.

Leng, K. T. P., Kumar, V., & Abdullah, M. H. (2013). Written feedback on ESL student writers’ academic essays. Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. & Hum, 21(2), 477-502.

Mahfoodh, O. H. A., & Pandian, A. (2011). A qualitative case study of EFL students’ affective reactions to and perceptions of their teachers’ written feedback. English Language Teaching, 4(3), 14-25. DOI: 10.5539/elt.v4n3p14

Mubarak, Z. H., & Jusmaya, A. (2018). Written corrective feedback (WCF) in reviewing students’ essay writing. Khazanah Ilmu Berazam, 1(2), 75-82.

Nagata, R. (2019). Toward a task feedback comment generation for writing learning. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, pages 3206-3215.

Pishkar, K., & Sarvestani, M.S. (2015). The effect of written corrective feedback on writing accuracy of intermediate learners. Theory And Practice In Language Studies, 5(10), 2046-2052.

Srichanyachon, N. (2012). An investigation of university EFL students attitudes toward peer and teacher feedback. Educational Research and Reviews, 7(26), 558-562.

Treglia, M. O. (2008). Feedback on feedback: exploring student responses to teachers’ written commentary. Journal of Basic Writing, 27(1), 105-137.

Van Beuningen, C.G., De Jong, N.H., & Kuiken, F. (2008). The effect of direct and indirect corrective feedback on L2 learners written accuracy. ITL International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 156, 279-296.

Wahlstorm, M., & Amneslararprogrammet. (2014). Effects of direct and indirect feedback on ESL/EFL writing: a literature review focusing on form. Dutch: Goteborgs Universitet.

Wiltse, E. M. (2002). Correlates of college students’ use of instructors’ comments.Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 57(2), 126-138.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31332/alg.v1i2.2282


  • There are currently no refbacks.