Students’ Reflection on Pair-work Information Gap (PIG) Activity in an EFL Instructional Context

Wa Ode Zulhidjah Awalyah, Abdul Halim, Dewi Atikah

Abstract


This qualitative research aims to investigate the students' response to pairwork information gap (PIG) activity in an EFL classroom. Reflective accounts of eighteen senior high school students were analyzed. The findings of this study indicated that the students enjoyed the classroom activities under PIG technique. The students revealed their enthusiasm, happiness, and enjoyment in learning English. They also acknowledge that activities under PIG could foster them to study and follow the lesson more dynamically. This present study implies that the use of PIG activity in the classroom should involve a variety of activities to raise students’ participation in the learning process.

 

Keywords: EFL classroom; pairwork information gap; reflective account; senior high school; students' response


Full Text:

84-90

References


Abduh, N. B. (2013). The implementation of information gap activities to imrpove students’ speaking and reading skill. Exposure Journal, 2(1), 68–75. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/224462-the-implementation-of-information-gap-ac-097b4c7c.pdf

Achmad, D., & Yusuf, Y. Q. (2014). Observing pairwork task in an English speaking class. International Journal of Instruction, 7(1), 151–164.

Afrizal, M. (2015). A classroom action research: improving speaking skills through information gap activities. English Education Journal (EEJ), 5(3), 342–355.

Amalia, A. R. (2013). The Perceived Characteristics and advantages of information gap activities in learning speaking at Englishpedia. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Andrade, C. (2011). The development of oral skills in foreign language learners through information gap exercises. An E-Journal of Teacher Education and Applied Languiage Studies, 2(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Baleghizadeh, S. (2009). The effect of pair work on a word building task. ELT Journal, 64(4), 405–413. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccp097

Brooks, F. B., Donato, R., & McGlonem, J. V. (1997). When are they going to say “It” right? Uunderstanding learner talk during pairwork activity. Foreign Language Annals, 30(4), 524–541. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1997.tb00860.x

Chin, C. (2006). Classroom interaction in science: Teacher questioning and feedback to students’ responses. International Journal of Science Education, 28(11), 1315–1346. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600621100

Defrioka, A. (2016). The use of information gap activities in (Classroom action research at SMK). Jurnal Bahasa Dan Pembelajaran Bahasa, 10(2), 116–126.

Doughty, C., & Pica, T. (1986). Information gap tasks: Do they facilitate second language acquisition? TESOL Quarterly, 20(2), 305–325. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586546

Eyler, J. (2002). Reflection: Linking service and learning-linking students and communities. Journal of Social Issues, 58(3), 517–534.

Hendra, I., Kasim, U., & Aziz, Z. A. (2018). Teaching efl speaking using the information gap technique. English Education Journal, 9(1), 166–174.

Hsieh, S., Jang, Y., Hwang, G., & Chen, N. (2011). Computers & education effects of teaching and learning styles on students ’ reflection levels for ubiquitous learning. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1194–1201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.01.004

Irona, A., & Ratmanida. (2018). Using information gap activity in classroom interaction to increase the students’ speaking ability. Journal of English Language Teaching, 7(1), 217–222.

Jondeya, R. S. (2011). The effectiveness of using information gap on developing speaking skills for the eighth graders in Gaza governorate schools. https://library.iugaza.edu.ps/thesis/96013.pdf

Moxham, B. J., & Moxham, S. A. (2007). The relationships between attitudes course aims and teaching methods for the teaching of gross anatomy in the medical curriculum. 11(1), 19–30.

Nakahama, Y., Tyler, A., & Lier, L. Van. (2001). Negotiation of meaning in conversational and information gap activities: A comparative discourse analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 35(3), 377–522. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588028

Namaziandost, E., Hashemifardnia, A., & Shafiee, S. (2019). The impact of opinion gap reasoning gap and information gap tasks on efl learners’ speaking fluency. Cogent Social Sciences, 5(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2019.1630150

Park, Y. (2018). Task in process during information gap activities in Korean middle school English classrooms. English Teaching, 73(2), 59–86. https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.73.2.201806.59

Pellowe, W. R. (1996). Modifying pairwork activities to encourage the use of English and communication strategies: An action research project. English Language Teacher Education and Development, 2(1), 90–111. http://search.proquest.com/docview/58344107?accountid=14548%5Cnhttp://metadata.lib.hku.hk/hku?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&genre=article&sid=ProQ:ProQ:llba&atitle=Modifying+Pairwork+Activities+to+Encourage+the+Use+of+Englis

Sinaga, N. R. B. (2017). Applying three types of information gap task in speaking class the second grade of SMA Negeri 1 Seputih Mataram.

Zohairy, S. (2014). Effective pairwork strategies to enhance Saudi pre-intermediate college students’ language production in speaking activities. European Scientific Journal, 10(2), 50–63.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31332/alg.v1i2.2295

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.