 |
|---|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
AUTHOR GUEDLINES
Author Guidelines for Manuscript Preparation
Authors who submit manuscripts to the editors must adhere to the author guidelines and the prescribed template. Manuscripts that do not comply with the guidelines or use a different format will be rejected by the editorial team prior to review. The editorial team will only accept manuscripts that meet the specified formatting requirements (available for download in the Template and Author Guidelines). This template is designed to assist authors in preparing their manuscripts and represents the exact format expected by the editors. To use this template, select “Save As” on this MS Word file into your document, then copy and paste your manuscript into it. All manuscripts submitted to the journal must be written in English.
Paper Format
Manuscripts must be written in English and typed in MS Word (.doc) format, using 12-point Times New Roman font; margins of 3 cm on the left, right, top, and bottom; 1.5 line spacing on A4-sized paper; with a length between 4,000 and 7,000 words (including abstract, references, and footnotes).
The article structure consists of: (a) Title; (b) Author(s) name, affiliation, and email address of the corresponding author; (c) Abstract; (d) Keywords; (e) Introduction; (f) Method; (g) Findings; (h) Discussion; (i) Conclusion; (j) References; and (k) Appendices (if any).
Citations and references must follow the American Psychological Association (APA) 7th Edition (full note) style and use reference management software such as Mendeley (https://www.mendeley.com).
Manuscripts must be checked in terms of grammar, structure, and spelling. It is strongly recommended to use grammar-checking software such as Grammarly (http://app.grammarly.com).
Manuscripts must be submitted through the OJS (Kalosara Family Law Review website).
Title
The article title should reflect the novelty of the research, be concise and informative, and should not contain uncommon abbreviations. The main idea should be stated first, followed by a brief explanation. Use bold font for the article title, with initial capital letters for proper nouns, using 12-point Times New Roman Bold.
Author’s Name, Affiliation, and Corresponding Author’s Email Address
The author’s name, affiliation, and corresponding author’s email address should not be written in the manuscript itself but must be entered in the user profile on the journal’s website. It is also recommended to remove all document properties and personal information from your file. The corresponding author is responsible for handling all correspondence during the review, publication, and post-publication stages, including responding to inquiries regarding the research methodology and materials. Ensure that the email address provided is accurate and up to date.
Abstract
The abstract should be written in a single paragraph in Italic, 12-point Times New Roman, single-spaced, and should not exceed 250 words. The abstract is neither an introduction nor a conclusion. It should be concise and include a brief background of the problem, the objective of the article or research, the methodological approach, a summary of the main findings, and the implications of the study, while considering the word limit.
Keywords
Provide only specific and conceptual terms (words or phrases), ranging from 3 to 5 keywords, avoiding overly general ones. Keywords serve as labels for your manuscript and are crucial for indexing and search. Therefore, they should be carefully selected and closely related to the topic of the paper. Use only well-established abbreviations in the field. Each keyword phrase should be separated by a semicolon (;).
Introduction
The introduction should comprehensively present the background of the study in a concise and sequential manner, beginning with the core issue or research phenomenon directly addressed by the author. Subsequently, previous research by experts should be reviewed to provide depth and scholarly context (Research 1, Research 2, etc.). A clear gap analysis or statement of novelty should be included, referencing at least 15 relevant studies published within the last three years. Authors must explicitly state the uniqueness and contribution of their research, clearly positioning it within the existing body of literature (state of the art) as the foundation for their research questions.
In a scientific article format, references should not be presented as in a research report. Instead, they must be included in the literature review to demonstrate originality and scholarly contribution. All background information obtained from other sources must be properly cited to indicate the authenticity, novelty, and advancement of the research. The introduction should conclude with a clear statement of the article’s main argument or hypothesis.
Method
The method section must be described in practical, not conceptual, terms. It should provide sufficient information to allow readers to understand what was actually done in the research process. Avoid lengthy conceptual explanations about research types or approaches. Instead, focus on the research design, data sources, participants, data collection techniques, and data analysis procedures. The description should be detailed and contextually relevant.
Findings
The findings section should maintain a balanced composition and emphasize objectivity and clarity. Authors should present the data and results as they are, avoiding excessive interpretation or personal opinions. Structure the findings based on clearly defined analytical themes or categories. Ensure that the findings align with the research method, and present the coding or categorization process. Use original data (evidence) such as tables, figures, or relevant quotations instead of lengthy narrative descriptions.
Discussion
In the discussion section, authors must elaborate on their findings more deeply, beyond mere presentation. The discussion should begin by addressing “why” — explaining why the findings emerged as they did, considering the contextual, social, cultural, economic, and legal factors involved. Next, address the “so what” — the significance and contribution of the research. This section should clarify the theoretical and practical implications of the findings and position the study within existing scholarship by comparing it with previous studies. If similarities exist, explain how the study reinforces prior research; if differences arise, highlight their academic meaning. The discussion should connect the findings to the theoretical framework, showing whether they support, critique, or extend existing theories. Finally, conclude the discussion by outlining the implications, which may include: (1) theoretical contributions, (2) practical benefits for communities or institutions, and (3) policy recommendations.
Conclusion
The conclusion should summarize the main findings, implications, limitations, and contributions of the current research, and provide suggestions for future studies. Example: Religious spatial segregation reflects the structured intolerance in the urban society of Yogyakarta. Intolerance is embedded in social relations and transactions, such as in property sales and rentals restricted to members of the same faith. This trend shows that understanding space solely in physical terms neglects its social dynamics. The development of spatial segregation leads to weakened intergroup relations, increasing the potential for intolerance due to reduced intergroup interactions. This study is limited to a single area; thus, further comparative research with broader datasets is recommended to provide a more comprehensive understanding.
References
Every data citation or quotation from another source must be listed in the References section. All references must adhere to the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (APA) 7th Edition, managed using Mendeley reference management software. DOIs should be included wherever available, with full URL format provided for each electronic reference.
