Pluralism and Justice in Indonesian Inheritance Law: A Comparative Analysis of Customary, Islamic, and Civil Systems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31332/kalosara.v5i2.11434Abstract
The pluralism of inheritance law in Indonesia, encompassing customary law, Islamic law, and the Civil Code, reflects the country’s cultural, religious, and legal diversity. Despite accommodating such diversity, overlapping norms, divergent distribution principles, gender biases, and legal uncertainty remain significant challenges. Limited integrated comparative studies that analyze these three inheritance systems, considering gender and local cultural values, constitute a research gap. This study aims to: (1) conduct a normative-comparative analysis of principles, norms, and inheritance distribution mechanisms across the three legal regimes; (2) evaluate the implications of pluralism for equal rights, legal certainty, and potential disputes through statutory regulations, court decisions, and academic literature; and (3) propose a harmonization model that is inclusive, culturally sensitive, and grounded in substantive justice and gender equality. The study analyzes legislation, documented customary law, and relevant court decisions using a normative juridical and comparative approach. Theoretical frameworks include Legal Pluralism (Griffiths), Substantive Justice (Rawls), and Legal Harmonization (Otto). Findings indicate that, without harmonization, pluralism exacerbates legal uncertainty and gender inequality. A model based on local values and gender equality effectively reduces disputes and strengthens legal certainty, implying the need for national policies with technical guidelines for inclusive, culturally sensitive inheritance law harmonization that safeguards all citizens’ rights.
Keywords: Civil System, Customary System, Inheritance Law, Islamic System
The pluralism of inheritance law in Indonesia, encompassing customary law, Islamic law, and the Civil Code, reflects the country’s cultural, religious, and legal diversity. Despite accommodating such diversity, overlapping norms, divergent distribution principles, gender biases, and legal uncertainty remain significant challenges. Limited integrated comparative studies that analyze these three inheritance systems, considering gender and local cultural values, constitute a research gap. This study aims to: (1) conduct a normative-comparative analysis of principles, norms, and inheritance distribution mechanisms across the three legal regimes; (2) evaluate the implications of pluralism for equal rights, legal certainty, and potential disputes through statutory regulations, court decisions, and academic literature; and (3) propose a harmonization model that is inclusive, culturally sensitive, and grounded in substantive justice and gender equality. The study analyzes legislation, documented customary law, and relevant court decisions using a normative juridical and comparative approach. Theoretical frameworks include Legal Pluralism (Griffiths), Substantive Justice (Rawls), and Legal Harmonization (Otto). Findings indicate that, without harmonization, pluralism exacerbates legal uncertainty and gender inequality. A model based on local values and gender equality effectively reduces disputes and strengthens legal certainty, implying the need for national policies with technical guidelines for inclusive, culturally sensitive inheritance law harmonization that safeguards all citizens’ rights.
Keywords: Civil System, Customary System, Inheritance Law, Islamic System
References
Burhan, Muhammad. “Kedudukan dan Hak Perempuan Sebagai Ahli Waris dalam Hukum Kewarisan Indonesia.” Jurnal Mahkamah: Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Hukum Islam 2, no. 2 (Desember 2017): 284–326.
Dika Ratu dkk, “Pembagian Harta Warisan Berdasarkan Perspektif Hukum Perdata dan Hukum Islam”, Konsensus: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi, Volume 1 Nomor 4 Agustus 2024, 229-235
Ernik, dkk. “Hukum Waris dan Pluralisme Hukum.” Maddika: Journal of Islamic Family Law 4, no. 1 (Juli 2023): 38–47.
Lanny Kusumawati, “Pengantar Hukum waris Perdata Barat” (Surabaya: Laros Cet-1 2011)
Halimatul Maryani dkk, “Sistem Kekerabatann dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Hukum Waris Islam” Legal Brief, Volume 11 Nomor 4 Tahun 2022, 2518-2525
Martondang, Nurhidayah. “Analisis Perkembangan perempuan dalam hak waris.” Jurnal Review Pendidikan dan Pengajaran 7, no. 4 (29 September 2024): 14109.
Rahmat Haniru” Hukum Waris di Indonesia Perspektif Hukum Islam dan Hukum Adat”, Al-HUKUMA: The Indonesia Journal of Islamic Family Law Volume 4, Nomor 2 Desember 2014. 456-474
Suaidi, Abd Hannan. “Pluralisme Hukum (Islam) dalam Praktik dan penetapan Hak Waris di Kalangan Muslim Lokal Madura.” Asy-Syari`ah: Jurnal Hukum Islam 10, no. 1 (2024): 2. https://doi.org/10.55210/assyariah.v10i1. 1487p.
Sulistyowato Irianto, “Pluralisme Hukum Waris dan Keadilan Perempuan” (Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia).
Sovia Santika, Yusnita Eva, “Kewarisan Dalam Sistem Kekerabatan Matrilineal, Patrilineal dan Bilateral”, Al-Mashlahah: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Pranata Sosial Islam Volume, 11 Nomor 2 Tahun 2023, 193-203
Supriyadi. “Pilihan Hukum Kewarisan Dalam Masyarakat Pluralistik (Studi Komparasi Hukum Islam dan Hukum Perdata).” AL-‘ADALAH XII, no. 3 (Juni 2015): 553–68.
Danar Yuda Pratama, dkk “Pluralisme Hukum Mengenai Hak Waris Anak dari Perkawinan Beda Agama Di Indonesia” https://prosiding.unipma.ac.id/index.php/COLaS/article/view/5176 diakses pada 19.06 Wita 15 Maret 2025
https://quran.nu.or.id/an-nisa'/11, diakses 12.02, 22 Maret 2025
Nur Mohamad Kasim” Studi Komparatif Waris Menurut Hukum Islam dan Hukum Adat”, https://repository.ung.ac.id/get/simlit_res/1/270/studi-komparatif-waris-menurut-hukum-islam-dan-hukum-adat.pdf diakses 13.53 Wita 22 Maret 2025.
Surat An-Nisa' Ayat 12 | Tafsirq.com, Diakses pada 13.00 Wita, 16 April 2025.























