The Significance of Science literacy in Biology Learning

Syarif Rizalia, Zakky Fahrizi, Sukmawati Sukmawati

Abstract


The aim of the present study is: 1) to explore the quality of teachers’ understanding about science literacy in biology; 2) to explore inhibiting and supporting factors of the quality teachers’ understanding for science literacy in biology; and 3) to suggest solutions to enhance the understanding of science literacy for biology teachers. The present study involved biology teachers and the deputy principal for curriculum of MAN 1 South Konawe. The present study is a qualitative study involving a survey with questionnaires to measure the quality of understanding of the biology teachers in terms of biology science literacy. The data analysis involves: 1) analyzing initial interview data (collection, reduction, data display, conclusion); 2) testing data validity (through source triangulation, technique triangulation, and time triangulation). The result shows that: 1) the quality of the teachers’ understanding for the science  literacy in biology is interpreted based on the following indicators including the reinforcement of competence with the percentage of 36.36% which falls to into moderate category, and the support and follow-up for the development programs for literacy capability which falls into low category, accounting for 14.29%; 2) inhibiting and supporting factors for the quality of teachers’ understanding about biology science literacy is interpreted based on a number of indicators: a) both inhibiting and supporting internal factors that facilitate the implementation of science literacy-based learning, having the same influence by 50% respectively; b) external factors supporting the implementation science literacy-based learning having moderate influence of 40%, and the inhibiting external factor categorized moderate influence with the percentage of 60%; 3) Suggestions to improve the understanding of science literacy for biology teachers based on the inhibiting factors are to organize special science literacy-based activities, to create forum meetings with science literacy materials, to procure  digital libraries and virtual laboratories, as well to propose various activities budgeted and disbursed by the Ministry of Religious Affairs of South Konawe. The findings suggest that developing science literacy at MAN 1 South Konawe is essential for its teachers and school’s own important significance in carrying out the biology lessons.

Keywords


Science Literacy, Biology

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adawiyah, R., & Wisudawati, A. W. (2017). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Berbasis Literasi Sains : Menilai Pemahaman Fenomena Ilmiah Mengenai Energi. Indonesian Journal of Curriculum, 5(2), 112–121.

Anonim. (2023). Peringkat Indonesia pada PISA 2022 Naik 5-6 Posisi Dibanding 2018. Kementerian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan Nomor: 697/Sipers/A6/XII/2023.

Arisman, A., & Permanasari, A. (2015). Penerapan Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe STAD dengan Metode Praktikum dan Demonstrasi Multimedia Interaktif (MMI) dalam Pembelajaran IPA Terpadu untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Sains Siswa. Edusains, 7(2), 179–184. https://www.academia.edu/download/97764657/648cc191ba9505cf332d1bb87e0a9dfc976c.pdf

Asyhari, A., & Hartati, R. (2015). Profil Peningkatan Kemampuan Literasi Sains Siswa Melalui Pembelajaran Saintifik. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 4(2), 179–191. https://doi.org/10.24042/jpifalbiruni.v4i2.91

Gazali, Z., & Nahdatain, H. (2019). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Video Pada Materi Biologi Sel Untuk Siswa Sma/Ma Kelas Xi Ipa. JUPE : Jurnal Pendidikan Mandala, 4(5), 236–238. https://doi.org/10.36312/jupe.v4i5.867

Guerrero, G., & Sjöström, J. (2024). Critical scientific and environmental literacies: a systematic and critical review. Studies in Science Education, 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2024.2344988

Hanfstingl, B., Gnambs, T., Porsch, R., & Jude, N. (2023). Exploring the association between non-specialised science teacher rates and student science literacy: an analysis of PISA data across 18 nations. International Journal of Science Education, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2023.2262729

Irwandi, I. (2020). Strategi Pembelajaran Biologi (Lesson Study, Literasi Sains, dan Blended Learning) (A. Budiman (ed.); I). Pustaka Reka Cipta.

Junanto, T., Akhyar, M., Budiyono, B., & Suryani, N. (2020). Profile of Undergraduate Students as Prospective Science Teachers in terms of Science Literacy. 422(Icope 2019), 398–402. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200323.158

Muhajarah, K., & Sulthon, M. (2020). Pengembangan Laboratorium Virtual sebagai Media Pembelajaran: Peluang dan Tantangan. Justek : Jurnal Sains Dan Teknologi, 3(2), 77. https://doi.org/10.31764/justek.v3i2.3553

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Result. https://www.oecd.org/publication/pisa-2022-results/

Putra, A. E., Rohman, M. T., Linawati, L., & Hidayat, N. (2023). Pengaruh Literasi Digital terhadap Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru. Murhum : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 4(1), 201–211. https://doi.org/10.37985/murhum.v4i1.185

Rabiudin, R., Agnesa, O. S., Afifi, E. H. N., & Rahmadana, A. (2023). Pelatihan Pembelajaran Literasi Sains Menggunakan Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Sebagai Penyesuaian Terhadap Instrumen Assesmen Kompetensi Madrasah. I-Com: Indonesian Community Journal, 3(1), 88–102. https://ejournal.uniramalang.ac.id/index.php/i-com/article/download/2121/1495

Rahim, A. (2019). Prosiding Seminar Nasional: “Reaktualisasi Konsep Kewarganegaraan Indonesia.” In A. Wahyudi, R. Nababan, & F. Rachman (Eds.), Merefleksi Konsep Dasar Pendidikan Moral di Indonesia (pp. 39–42). Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Universitas Negeri Medan. http://digilib.unimed.ac.id/37491/1/Fulltext.pdf

Rakhmawan, A., Setiabudi, A., & Mudzakir, A. (2015). Perancangan Pembelajaran Literasi Sains Berbasis Inkuiri Pada Kegiatan Laboratorium. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran IPA, 1(1), 143. https://doi.org/10.30870/jppi.v1i1.331

Rohmawati, I. H., & Gayatri, Y. (2020). Analisis Literasi Sains Pembelajaran Abad Xxi Pada Matapelajaran Biologi Sma Di Gresik. Jurnal Pedago Biologi, 8(1), 38–48.

Saleh, A. R. (2016). Pengembangan Perpustakaan Digital. Tangerang Selatan: Universitas Terbuka, 2, 480 hlm., 21 cm.

Santiani, S., Peniati, E., & Rusilowati, A. (2019). Supervisi Tiga Tahap Penggunaan Laboratorium IPA Strategi Praktikum Bersama Dosen, Guru dan Siswa. Prosiding Seminar …, 798–805. https://proceeding.unnes.ac.id/index.php/snpasca/article/view/373%0Ahttps://proceeding.unnes.ac.id/index.php/snpasca/article/download/373/224

Sumanik, N. B., Nurvitasari, E., & Siregar, L. F. (2021). Analisis Profil Kemampuan Literasi Sains Mahasiswa Calon Guru Pendidikan Kimia. Quantum: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Sains, 12(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.20527/quantum.v12i1.10215




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31332/kd.v5i1.8459

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Syarif Rizalia, Zakky Fahrizi, Sukmawati Sukmawati

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Kulidawa indexed by:

free web stats
View My Stats

Creative Commons License
Jurnal Kulidawa under by Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.