Cohesive Devices Used in Argumentative Essays by Undergraduate EFL Learners

Hesti Rokhaniyah, Wildi Adila, Dwi Ana Binti Yulianti

Abstract


Cohesive devices are crucial points recognized as essential features of a good essay, yet employing them in an essay appropriately becomes problematic for learners. This study analyzes qualitatively cohesive devices to investigate EFL learners. It aims at examining how EFL learners apply cohesive devices in argumentative essays, the frequencies of cohesive devices errors in their writings, and the possible causes of EFL learners to produce cohesive devices. Twenty-five learners of the Department of International Relations, at a university in Ponorogo, were requested to produce argumentative essays that consisted of five paragraphs. Twenty-five essays had been identified with the number of errors of grammatical cohesion. Those errors were then analyzed to determine the possible causes affecting the learners’ errors. The find revealed that the number of grammatical cohesion utilized by EFL learners reached 2172, while 168 obtained errors. There was a heavy reliance on cohesive item use. The intralingual transfer mostly influenced the errors produced than the interlingual transfer. The intralingual errors percentage represented 96,9%; interlingual transfer errors reached 3.03%. It occurred due to the learners’ inability to employ the grammar rule. Hence, lecturer should employ the strategies for learners’ writing ability development, such as implementing collaborative learning, delivering the feedback, exposing learners to exercise, and applying a learning management system to result higher level of cohesion.


Keywords


Argumentative essay; Cohesive devices; Error analysis

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aqmarina, A. (2020). The exploration of cohesive devices in synopsis writings produced by English study program students of Universitas Gadjah Mada. SALEE: Study of Applied Linguistics and English Education, 1(01), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.35961/salee.v1i01.73

Alyousef, H. S. (2021). Text cohesion in English scientific texts written by Saudi undergraduate dentistry students: A multimodal discourse analysis of textual and logical relations in oral biology texts. SAGE Open, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211032194

Bagheri, Z., & Mahmoudi, A. (2015). Differential effects of explicit, implicit, and incidental teaching on learning grammatical cohesive devices. Theory and Practice in Llanguage Studies, 5(11), 2348. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0511.20

Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching (5th ed.). White

Plains, NY: Pearson Longman.

Chanyoo, N. (2018). Cohesive devices and academic writing quality of Thai undergraduate students. Journal of language teaching and research, 9(5), 994-1001. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0905.13

Dameria, S. (2019). The translation of cohesive devices in Indonesian and English abstracts in biology theses. Journal of ELT, Linguistics and Translation, 3(1).

Gailea, N., Syafrizal, S., & Hafipah, A. (2018). The analysis of cohesive devices in students ’ writing discussion text. The Journal of English Literacy Education, 5(2), 88–98.

Gholami, Javad, Roghayeh Ilghamii, Hassan Molla Hossein, F. T. (2017). Cohesive devices in Iranian research papers across social sciences and medical sciences : The case of conjunctives in papers o .... Iranian EFL Journal, 8(4), 292–309.

Haliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. New York: Longman.

Hidayat, A. (2016). An analysis of grammatical cohesive device of the short story the little match girl by Hans Christian Andersen 2016/2017. English Education: Jurnal Tadris Bahasa Inggris, 9(2), 232–244.

Klimova, B. F., & Hubackova, S. (2018). Grammatical cohesion in abstracts. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 664–668.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.276

Mohammed, A. S. (2015). Conjunctions as cohesive devices in the writings of English as second language learners. In Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (Vol. 208). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.182

Nilopa, L. M., Miftah, M. Z., & Sugianto, A. (2017). Cohesive devices (CDS) in expository essay written by Indonesian students of English as a foreign language. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699.

Omar, J. A., Hamad, S. H., & Saleem, B. Q. (2020). Grammatical cohesion skill for EFL learners: The case of university level Kurdish learners of English. European Journal of English Language Teaching, 5(4), 121–131.

https://doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v5i4.3255

Patriana, A.W., Rachmajanti, S., & Mukminatien N. (2016). Students' ability in using discourse markers to build coherence in composition. TEFLIN Journal, 27 (2), 203-214.https://dx.doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v27i2/203-216

Rahman, Y. A. (2018). The use of cohesive devices in ASIAN English as foreign language journal. Jurnal Akrab Juara. 3(189), 50–62. Retrieved from https://akrabjuara.com/index.php/akrabjuara/article/view/341

Rahman, Z. A. A. A. (2013). The use of cohesive devices in descriptive writing by Omani student-teachers. SAGE Open, 3(4).

https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013506715

Rahayu, T., & Cahyono, B.Y. (2015). Discourse markers in expository essays written by Indonesian students of EFL. International Journal of Language and Linguistics. 2(2), 21-29. Retrieved from http://ijilnet.com/journal/index/2162

Rassouli, M., & Abbasvandi, M. (2019). The effects of explicit instruction of grammatical cohesive devices on intermediate Iranian learners’ writing. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 2(2), 15–22. Retrieved from http://www.european-science.com

Sandra Putri Astariani, P. (2020). The analysis of cohesive devices found in good-bye. Udayana Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (UJoSSH), 4(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.24843/ujossh.2020.v04.i01.p08

Sari, F. K., & Indarti, Y. (2016). An analysis of cohesive devices in the article entitled Bali 9 executions : A ‘ deliberate , culpable ssub ’ of Australia published by the Australian. Anglicist, 05(02), 96–102. Retrieved from https://journal.unair.ac.iddownload-fullpapers-anglicist7476c26fc3full.pdf

Shirazi, M. A., & Mousavi Nadoushani, S. M. (2017). The locus of adversative conjunctions in the research articles: Have they niched or vanished? SAGE Open, 7(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017700946

Trisnaningrum, Y., Alek, A., & Hidayat, D. N. (2019). Discourse analysis of grammatical cohesion devices in college students’ academic writing essay. IJEE (Indonesian Journal of English Education), 6(1), 79–90.

https://doi.org/10.15408/ijee.v6i1.12502

Uru, O. B., Sudirman, A., & Nugroho, A. D. (2021). Exploring cohesions in EFL academic writing: A state of the art on the study of cohesions. Elsya : Journal of English Language Studies, 3(2), 141–149.

https://doi.org/10.31849/elsya.v3i2.6730




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31332/lkw.v0i0.3491

Copyright (c) 2022 Hesti Rokhaniyah, Wildi Adila, Dwi Ana Binti Yulianti

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Langkawi: Journal of The Association for Arabic and English indexed by:


      PKP-Index   crossref sinta dimensions Sertifikat-Akreditasi-Jurnal-Langkawi-2020-1


Web
Analytics

Langkawi Journal Stats

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.