An Analysis of Metadiscourse and Pragmatic Hedges in Fred Rogers’ Commencement Speech

Intan Mustika Sari

doi:10.31332/lkw.v0i0.5423

An Analysis of Metadiscourse and Pragmatic Hedges in Fred Rogers’ Commencement Speech

Intan Mustika Sari

Abstract

The research on metadiscourse formerly examined the language tools used to construct a speech without looking further at the contextual-related resource. This study aims to investigate the textual and interpersonal meanings of Fred Rogers' commencement speech in Hyland's metadiscourse by examining interactive and interactional metadiscourse resources combined with Salager-Meyer's pragmatic hedges categorization. This present qualitative study adopted Bogdan et al. (1975) research design. The data were taken from Marquette University website on April 9th, 2022, and validated through documentation and audit trails. Afterward, they were identified and analyzed using Hyland's metadiscourse and Salager-Meyer pragmatic hedges framework in the interactive data analysis model proposed by Miles and Huberman which consists of data reduction, data display, and conclusion. The results revealed that self-mentions are the most significant interactional resource, reaching 47.39% of the total metadiscourse found in Fred Rogers' speech, and 30.33% are transition markers from interactive resources. In addition, the most significant hedge categories are shields and approximators that share the same accumulation at 35.29%. It showed that most words represent the speaker's intention to attract the audience's attention and emphasize his message by portraying the speaker's identity, attitude, and personal doubt. These results contribute to an understanding of metadiscourse markers and pragmatic hedges used for involving the speaker as the major constructor of discourse produced through the selection of markers in his utterances. The implications of this study can be a reference in selecting the linguistic markers to build effective communication for engaging the audience through discourse.

Keywords

Interactional Metadiscourse Resources; Interactive Metadiscourse Resources; Interpersonal Meaning; Pragmatic Hedges; Textual Meaning

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abbas, A., Djatmika, D., Sumarlam, S., & Nurkamto, J. (2021). Functioning Expressive Speech Acts in the 2019 Indonesian Presidential Election Debates. Langkawi: Journal of The Association for Arabic and English, 7(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.31332/lkw.v7i1.2573

Astia, I. (2020). Politeness Strategy in Interlanguage Pragmatics of Complaints by International Students. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 349–362.

Bogdan, R., Taylor, S. J., & Taylor, S. S. (1975). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A phenomenological approach to the social sciences. Wiley-Interscience.

Borsuk, A. J. (2018, January 30). Everyone's neighbor: Mister Rogers' message continues to encourage. Journal Sentinel. https://www.jsonline.com/story/archives/2018/01/30/everyones-neighbor-mister-rogers-message-continues-encourage/1079857001/

Bougie, R., & Sekaran, U. (2019). Research methods for business: A skill building approach. John Wiley & Sons.

Brown, P., Levinson, S. C., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage (Vol. 4). Cambridge university press.

Chueasuai, P. (2017). The Interpersonal Metafunction and Translation of Power Relations: A Case Study of Fifty Shades of Grey. Manusya: Journal of Humanities, 20(3), 1–22.

Ekawati, R., & Kurnia, F. D. (2018). Ideology Representation of 'Us' and 'Them' through Material Processes of Transitivity in Yudhoyono's Presidential Speech Texts. Proceeding Icon-ELite, 1(1), 449–456.

Erlinda, R. (2022). Teachers' Impoliteness Strategies in Providing Feedback in a Microteaching Class. Langkawi: Journal of The Association for Arabic and English, 8(2), 98–114. https://doi.org/10.31332/lkw.v0i0.3936

Firdaus, S. F., Soemantri, Y. S., & Yuliawati, S. (2021). A corpus-based study of self-mention markers in English research articles. International Journal of Language Teaching and Education, 5(2).

Fred Rogers Commencement Speech // University Honors // Marquette University. (n.d.). Retrieved April 9, 2022, from https://www.marquette.edu/university-honors/honorary-degrees/rogers-speech.php

Ginsburg, S., van der Vleuten, C., Eva, K. W., & Lingard, L. (2016). Hedging to save face: A linguistic analysis of written comments on in-training evaluation reports. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 21, 175–188.

Halimatussakdiah, Sibarani, R., & Fachry, M. E. (2020). The role of Tamiang’s local wisdom in decreasing postpartum depression: A linguistic anthropology study. Enfermería Clínica, 30(2), 491–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcli.2019.07.145

Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd edn)(London and Melbourne: Edward Arnold).

Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173–192.

Hyland, K. (2017). Metadiscourse: What is it and where is it going? Journal of Pragmatics, 113, 16–29.

Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2004). Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, 25(2), 156–177.

Hyland, K., Wang, W., & (Kevin) Jiang, F. (2022). Metadiscourse across languages and genres: An overview. Lingua, 265(1), 103205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2021.103205

Kennedy, G. E., & Judd, T. S. (2007). Expectations and reality: Evaluating patterns of learning behaviour using audit trails. Computers & Education, 49(3), 840–855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.023

Kristiani, I., Sutopo, D., & Warsono, W. (2018). The Ideational Meaning in Khalil Gibranâ€TM s work â€ œThe Prophetâ€. English Education Journal, 8(4), 479–488.

Kuhi, D., & Mojood, M. (2014). Metadiscourse in Newspaper Genre: A Cross-linguistic Study of English and Persian Editorials. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98(1), 1046–1055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.515

Liu, J. (2020). A Pragmatic Analysis of Hedges from the Perspective of Politeness Principle. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 10(12), 1614–1619.

Liu, S., & Zhang, J. (2021). Using Metadiscourse to Enhance Persuasiveness in Corporate Press Releases: A Corpus-Based Study. SAGE Open, 11(3), 21582440211032164.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.

Mohajer, L., & Jan, J. Mohd. (2015). Preserving Face and the Use of Hedges in Masculine World of Men. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 208(1), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.176

Mulatsih, S. (2008). Hedges: The Expressions of Doubt and Certainty. LITE: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Budaya, 4(2), 73–81.

Murakami, T., & Hashiya, K. (2014). Development of reference assignment in children: A direct comparison to the performance of cognitive shift. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(1), 523.

Omo, I. C., & Idegbekwe, D. (2020). Pragmatic Hedges in Editorials: A Focus on Vanguard, Guardian and Sun Newspaper Editorials in 2017. Journal of Translation and Language Studies, 1(1), 26–36.

Plappert, G. (2019). Not hedging but implying: Identifying epistemic implicature through a corpus-driven approach to scientific discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 139(1), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.09.001

Qin, W., & Uccelli, P. (2019). Metadiscourse: Variation across communicative contexts. Journal of Pragmatics, 139(1), 22–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.10.004

Robin Stern, opinion contributor. (2019, December 30). Mr. Rogers and the importance of social and emotional learning [Text]. The Hill. https://thehill.com/opinion/healthcare/476163-mr-rogers-and-the-importance-of-social-and-emotional-learning/

Salager-Meyer, F. (1994). Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 13(2), 149–170.

Sari, I. M. (2020). The Online Media Practice in Covering Indonesian National Police' s Prevention Efforts on the Prohibited Party' s Ideology Spread in Indonesia. 5(1), 149–165. https://ijeltal.org/index.php/ijeltal/issue/view/9

Siddiqui, A. (2018). "The Principle Features of English Pragmatics in Applied Linguistics". Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 9(2), 77–80.

Surono, S., Sumarlam, S., Wiratno, T., & Marmanto, S. (2021). Directive Speech Acts in Parenting and Politeness Implications Based on the Schools' Missions: A Study on Kindergarten Teachers in Teaching Learning Process in Yogyakarta. Langkawi: Journal of The Association for Arabic and English, 7(1), 66–80.

Tran, T. Q., & Duong, T. M. (2013). Hedging: A comparative study of research article results and discussion section in applied linguistics and chemical engineering. English for Specific Purposes World, 41(14), 1–13.

Wang, J., & Zeng, L. (2021). Disciplinary Recognized Self-Presence: Self-Mention Used With Hedges and Boosters in PhD Students' Research Writing. SAGE Open, 11(2), 21582440211005456.

Yuliana, D., & Imperiani, E. D. A. (2017). The realization of interpersonal meaning in course newsletters: A systemic functional linguistic perspective. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 181–188.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31332/lkw.v0i0.5423

Copyright (c) 2023 Intan Mustika Sari