Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices Towards Language Assessment in an Indonesian Islamic University

Muhammad Nur Akbar Rasyid

Abstract


In recent decades, assessment design and implementation issues have been a severe concern in teaching and learning English as a Foreign Language (EFL). Language assessment, which is inextricably linked to EFL teachers' conceptions and education, influences students and their learning. This case study investigates teachers' underlying beliefs concerning EFL assessment as well as their practices in the classrooms of Indonesian Islamic universities. The study engaged ten university EFL teachers who work in an Indonesian Islamic Higher Education institution. The participants were recruited using the purposive sampling technique. Semi-structured interviews were used to determine teachers' beliefs about language assessment. Thematic analysis was used to transcribe, code and segment data to establish themes, categories, and subcategories that depict participants' beliefs regarding EFL assessment. The findings revealed that the participants used various terms to describe assessment, providing an exciting background to their practices. They also believed in language assessment's varied purposes, including administrative and pedagogical purposes. Most participants conceived assessment as an extension of EFL classroom teaching and learning, thus significantly impacting student learning and approaches to learning. Therefore, considering how assessments enhance student learning would influence teachers' decision-making. This paper also describes the implications of these findings for better governance of institutional systems for assessing English as a Foreign Language

Keywords


Language assessment; Language classroom; Teachers’ beliefs; Teachers’ practice

Full Text:

PDF

References


Azis, A. (2012). Teachers’ conceptions and use of assessment in student learning. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 40–51. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v2i1.72

Azis, A. (2015). Conceptions and practices of assessment: A case of teachers representing improvement conception. TEFLIN Journal, 26(2), 129–154. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v26i2/129-154

Bliem, C. L., & Davinroy, K. H. (1997). Teachers’ beliefs about assessment and instruction in literacy. Education and Information Studies (Vol. 1522). Los Angeles, CA.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2016). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper (Ed.), APA handbook of research method in Psychology (pp. 57–71). USA: American Psychological Association.

Brown, G. T. L. (2004). Teachers’ conceptions of assessment: Implications for policy and professional development. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 11(3), 301–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594042000304609

Burden, P. R., & Byrd, D. M. (2010). Methods for effective teaching: Meeting the needs of all students (5th ed.). The United States of America: Pearson Education Limited.

Ezzy, D. (2002). Qualitative analysis: Practice and innovation. Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin.

Finch, A. (2002). Authentic assessment: Implications for EFL performance testing in Korea. Secondary Education Research, 49, 89–122.

Gerring, J. (2007). Case study research: Principles and practices. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Inayah, N., Komariah, E., & Nasir, A. (2019). The practice of authentic assessment in an EFL speaking classroom. Studies in English Language and Education, 6(1), 152–162.

Muñoz, A. P., Palacio, M., & Escobar, L. (2012). Teachers’ beliefs about assessment in an EFL context in Colombia. Profile, 14(1), 143–158.

Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and Educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062003307

Popham, W. J. (2017). Classroom assessment: What teachers need to know (8th Ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Pearson Education, Inc.

Pratiwi, N. P. W., Dewi, N. L. P. E. S., & Paramartha, A. A. G. Y. (2019). The reflection of HOTS in EFL teachers’ cummative assessment. Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation, 3(3), 127–133. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v3i3.21853

Puad, L. M. A. Z., & Ashton, K. (2021). Teachers’ views on classroom-based assessment: An exploratory study at an Islamic boarding school in Indonesia. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 41(2), 253–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2020.1761775

Punch, K. F. (2005). Introduction to social research: Quantitative and qualitative approaches (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications Ltd.

Qadi, A. (2021). An exploratory study of EFL teachers’ assessment conceptions at a Saudi university. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 12(3), 464–485. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3952970

Saad, M. R. B. M., Sardareh, S. A., & Ambarwati, E. K. (2013). Iranian secondary school EFL teachers’ assessment beliefs and roles. Life Science Journal, 10(3), 1638–1647. https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2013-0137.1

Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.2307/1176145

Shohamy, E., Inbar-Lourie, O., & Poehner, M. E. (2008). Investigating assessment perceptions and practices in the advances foreign language classroom (Report No. 1108). University Park, PA.

Stiggins, R. J. (2002). Assessment crisis: The absence of assessment for learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(10), 758–765. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170208301010

Tara, M. (2005). Assessment -summative and formative- some theoretical reflections. British Journal of Educational Studies, 53(4), 466–478. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2005.00307.x

Wang, L., Lee, I., & Park, M. (2020). Chinese university EFL teachers’ beliefs and practices of classroom writing assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 66(September), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100890

Widiastuti, I. A. M. S., Mukminatien, N., Prayogo, J. A., & Irawati, E. (2020). Dissonances between teachers’ beliefs and practices of formative assessment in EFL classes. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.1315a

Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Applied Social Research Methods Series, Vol.5. (3rd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, London: SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1300/J145v03n03_07

Yu, S., & Lee, I. (2014). An analysis of Chinese EFL students ’ use of first and second language in peer feedback of L2 writing. System, 47(December), 28–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.08.007




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31332/lkw.v0i0.4475

Copyright (c) 2022 Muhammad Nur Akbar Rasyid

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Langkawi: Journal of The Association for Arabic and English indexed by:


      PKP-Index   crossref sinta dimensions Sertifikat-Akreditasi-Jurnal-Langkawi-2020-1


Web Analytics

Langkawi Journal Stats

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.